Little Known Facts About h4831sc load data.

Little Known Facts About h4831sc load data.

Blog Article

I'm a real enthusiast in the H4831 powder. I get wonderful velocity and accuracy from any caliber I've tried using it in. From the twenty five-06 up to the 338 it is my head to powder of choice. I try all types of powders when Operating up loads, however the H4831 usually seems to arrive out on leading for accuracy and velocity when the situation is with the 06 class or larger sized.

I might say you would be improved off looking at if anyone would be prepared to trade you some Varget in your H4831SC.

WARNING: This product or service can expose you to steer, which is known on the Point out of California to trigger cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. To learn more drop by – .

243, and a lot of the loads I have commenced with consist of, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I'm likely to shoot the IMR7828 loads initial, accompanied by the W780 loads just so there won't be any surprises in the event the H-4831sc loads demonstrate a shotgun pattern! Who is aware, I just could find a use for it In fact.

In any case, I realized The 2 lbs . of H4831SC made use of precisely the same data, but I did not know no matter if there was just about anything distinctive between a pound of powder labeled "Extreme" and one not so labeled. A contact to Hodgdon verified that they had been actually identical and the only real change was The emblem around the label.

Did you ever check out H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I have a h4831sc 300wsm now. Capturing 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with typical chamber. Questioning what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?

If there isn't a load data it truly is since this powder isn't well suited for this cartridge. Generally a person will likely not uncover 1 powder to suit all cartridges, along with the family members of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you're inquiring about doesn't do the job.

excaliber reported: I've found the precise opposite to generally be real in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally exact powder in my 300 Win Mag.

You might possibly: one) Proceed and have the firearm(s) mentioned underneath mechanically removed from your shopping cart:

Liberalism; The impossible nonetheless accepted Idea that it is entirely probable to choose up a turd from the clean up conclusion.

I needed a little additional myself so I went ahead and grabbed the 8lb jug being coated for some time (and possess a good amount of the identical number of powder).

It is possible that no even more discussion is needed, by which circumstance we advise starting a different thread. If nonetheless you really feel your response is necessary you are able to nonetheless do this.

Southwest Idaho I attempted H4831sc in my 300 WM but experienced significantly better pace and accuracy with H1000. I might relatively use a slower burning powder with 215g pills.

I sawed one in 50 percent to determine how thick the jackets h4831sc load data ended up, and they ended up effortlessly two times as thick as a 50-grain hollow issue was. Ditto for your sixty four-grain Energy Position, as these bullets are built for deer, not prairie puppies or woodchucks. You now know everything I learn about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I do not know something in the least concerning the 223. I doubt that you are going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let us understand how h4831sc load data it goes.